Mastersball

Articles of Configuration


Is there a one-size-fits-all answer for early-season FAAB spending? PDF Print E-mail
Articles of Configuration
Written by Brian Walton   
Friday, 13 April 2012 17:54

Writing my columns for publication late in the week can be good for the reader – if you pick up some ideas you can deploy quickly in your weekly free agent process. The timing isn’t always great for me, however, as the previous deadline-related activity can often seem like old news.

Such is the case this week, following the first FAAB period of 2012 for Tout Wars. My intention was to spin a variation on the annual single-league article theme of the pros and cons of spending freely early versus holding money for the trade deadline.

I was discouraged from doing this, as one of my fellow NL Tout competitors, Derek Carty of Baseball Prospectus, already covered that ground exceptionally thoroughly and well on Monday, as did our own Greg Morgan on Tuesday in the context of the mixed-league NFBC. The core points are the potential to fill gaps quickly and the declining value of FAAB over the course of the season.

Still, I have some personal thoughts and observations along this general theme that I’d like to share.

As I wrote about last week, there was a pent-up demand in Tout to acquire players that dates all the way back to draft day and included the first few days of the regular season.

As a result, this past weekend, the 13 NL Tout warriors siphoned another 28 players out of the already-shallow NL pool, averaging more than two per team. Most were additions to cover players on the disabled lists of their respective clubs. I had three such openings.

The most obvious area to consider is the early closer shifts. Unfortunately, that action has been mostly AL-focused in the early going. To that end, over on the American League side of Tout, Jeff Erickson of RotoWire dropped half of his full-season FAAB allocation on Hector Santiago of the White Sox, for example.

Fernando Rodney of Tampa Bay also seems to be Joe Maddon’s current choice after closing two consecutive games last weekend, picking up saves in each. The ultimate resolution to the situation in Boston is anyone’s guess at this point, with neither Mark Melancon nor Alfredo Aceves seemingly able to hold onto the hot potato. Jonathan Broxton and Joe Nathan are also struggling in the early going.

Here in the NL, there were no such obvious closer targets. Despite that, two owners, Phil Hertz of BaseballHQ and our own Todd Zola, spent over 20 percent of their respective 2012 FAAB stipends out of the gate. Todd made it very clear that he didn’t want to get in a hole so he went after “decent talent” early.

Hertz snagged Mets outfielder Kirk Nieuwenhuis ($12) and Nationals starter Ross Detwiler ($14 Vickrey bid reduced to $10). Lord Zola purchased Braves utilityman Eric Hinske ($11 Vickrey bid reduced to $10), Cubs reliever Rafael Dolis ($7) and Cardinals reliever Kyle McClellan ($7).

I bid on Nieuwenhuis myself, as he holds the good side of what looks to be a centerfield platoon with Scott Hairston. My interest level was increased because I own the injured player, Andres Torres, whose trip to the disabled list created the opportunity.

At this point, we don’t know how long Torres’ re-injured calf will keep him out. I only went $2 in my losing bid on Nieuwenhuis, perhaps hoping it won’t be long.

Hertz believes Nieuwenhuis can hold the job if he hits .260. With the Vickrey rules closing the difference between his $8 perceived value and his $12 bid, Hertz went for the higher amount. Good thing he did, as he tied another Tout owner higher in the standings at that price.

Instead, I spent $1 on Justin Maxwell. Claimed off waivers by the Astros from the Yankees, Maxwell is out of options so should remain in the majors. The outfielder showed promise with the Nationals in the past and could take advantage of opportunity in Houston. A pinch-hit two-run home run in his first game with the club was a nice start.

Zola preferred Hinske in a big way over Nieuwenhuis as he waits for Allen Craig’s return, but Todd didn’t bite on Maxwell. The ongoing injury situation in Atlanta represents potential opportunity to Todd.

Detwiler and Houston’s Lucas Harrell ($6) were the only active starting pitchers to draw cash bids in NL Tout this week. The Astros’ hurler seems to have a relatively secure rotation spot but may have been at peak value coming off a seven-inning shutout 2012 debut prior to the bidding deadline.

Not having great confidence in the 26-year-old Harrell, I went only $3, knowing I would probably miss out. Instead, I snagged Anthony Bass of San Diego for $0. Bass’ big opportunity may be limited to how long Tim Stauffer and Dustin Moseley are out, but I see him as having little difference from Harrell one week ago. Bass made a nice initial start for San Diego Thursday night. Had it not been for shaky defense behind him, the 25-year-old right-hander would have remained around long enough to collect a win.

Hertz recounted that he intended to snag Detwiler in the reserve rounds on draft day, but simply forgot. That is a very easy thing to happen, especially given the breakneck pace of the Tout draft. When Detwiler went high in his local Washington league last weekend, Hertz decided to ensure he got his man in Tout.

In hindsight, I should have been in on Detwiler too. After all, holding down a roster spot until Chien-Ming Wang is ready could end up being a career-long assignment. The reality is I would have lost out in the bidding to Hertz, anyway.

Though the Cubs’ ninth-inning situation is under some pressure due to the inconsistencies of Carlos Marmol and Kerry Wood, it isn’t clear any major changes are coming. Zola wanted to be ready as he hopped all over Dolis. Because he felt the greater free agent strength was in pitching this past week, Zola made Dolis his swing man. For seven dollars less ($0), I opted for a less-shiny closer-in-waiting in Wilton Lopez of the Astros.

Obviously, the common thread among Maxwell, Harrell and Lopez is the woeful Astros, a club where jobs could more easily be opened if some stumble and others step forward. Of course, any save opportunities are going to be fewer and farther between.

I honestly don’t know if spending one-fifth to one-quarter of one’s money the first week will prove to be good or bad in the case of this league, in this season. I am not for hoarding cash, but also want to ensure I receive value for my money. I just didn’t see it this past week. Next time could be a different story.

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 14-year history. Though he is the only one to remember or care, he also finished second in each of the two subsequent seasons. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com and in-season at FOXSportsMidwest.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Last Updated on Saturday, 14 April 2012 08:46
 
Split Opening Day Leads to Splitting Headaches PDF Print E-mail
Articles of Configuration
Written by Brian Walton   
Saturday, 07 April 2012 00:00

Especially early in the season, when drafting activity is heavy and many players are active in a number of different leagues and formats, it is easy to forget the rules nuances in any particular league.

Couple that with an unusual dual Opening Day in 2012, consisting of a pair of American League games in Japan the week before the “traditional opener” in the USA (if that is what you call the first game in Marlins Park), and there are bound to be questions about what can be done when in your league.

When these factors come together, chaos can ensue in any fantasy setting, even an industry one. So it was this past weekend across Tout Wars.

A misinterpretation of the rules by one of the league leaders led to the expectation of FAAB transactions on April 2. This was eagerly anticipated by a number of owners who wanted to move injured players to the disabled list and acquire immediate replacements as quickly as possible.

A major implementation problem raised its head when it became clear that most major league clubs did not set their Opening Day rosters by the Monday morning, April 2 Tout deadline for the week. Further, teams also did not yet declare their back-dated disabled list players and were not required by MLB rules to do so until 5 P.M. ET Wednesday. (Note the fact that most DLed players went on retroactive to March 26, potentially making them available sooner than 15 days into the season.)

As a result, there were many players known to be injured and “surely” DL-bound that had not yet been officially designated by MLB. To buy time for more of these transactions to come to light, several anxious Tout owners pushed for a special accommodation – a one-time 24-hour delay in the deadline for this week only.

However, because of MLB’s target for roster setting not being until Wednesday afternoon, moving out the Tout date would not accomplish its desired objective.

The owner of the league’s stat site (also a Tout participant) had decided independently to make a call on each injured player, designating a group of them as being on the site’s DL for fantasy purposes this week – before the real MLB moves occurred.

For a period of time over the weekend, Tout members were encouraged to nominate players for addition to this list. That led to a literal flood of emails before the league leaders realized the slippery slope upon which they were preparing to embark.

A return to the Tout Wars constitution provided the answers, which had been there waiting for us all along.

There are two important passages. First:

DEADLINES

Transactions may be made beginning the second Monday after draft day.

April 2 is the second Monday following draft day. However, the constitution does NOT say that FAAB will occur at that time. The first week’s transactions are intended to be activation-deactivation moves only.

To be honest, the document can be a bit confusing. Immediately following the above passage, a detailed explanation of the FAAB process is provided. It seems out of place, implying a connection that is not intended.

Here is the second relevant section of the constitution:

FREE AGENCY

Beginning with the second transaction period following the conclusion of the draft, through the end of the regular season, free agents in the free agent pool may be signed, without limit, in the following manner…

This seems to reinforce that the first transaction period is for roster moves only, with no FAAB bidding. It is implied that the first transaction period occurs between the draft and the first games, though that is unstated.

Ultimately, after a lot of thrashing, the Tout leaders came around to the ruling that is supported by the constitution – to allow activations-deactivations on April 2, but hold off on FAAB transactions until April 9. By then, all season-opening DL moves across MLB will have become very clear. In fact, the first group of MLB players to come off the DL should be almost ready.

The bottom line is an old, tired message here. Make sure you follow your constitution to the letter and if it is vague, clarify the gray areas in writing. You can’t make changes in-season, but there is nothing to stop you from taking the appropriate notes to facilitate the formal changes this fall.

Alternatively, if you make rules tweaks or one-off interpretations on the fly, expect trouble will follow. Good intentions alone aren’t enough. Make sure you don’t weaken your constitution by conflicting with it, even unintentionally. Keep it living, active and strong.

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 14-year history. Though he is the only one to remember or care, he also finished second in each of the two subsequent seasons. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com and in-season at FOXSportsMidwest.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Last Updated on Saturday, 07 April 2012 21:03
 
Where to find value in NL Tout Wars PDF Print E-mail
Articles of Configuration
Written by Brian Walton   
Friday, 30 March 2012 19:35

A very visible league like Tout Wars - in which I competed in the National League-only auction last weekend – offers an interesting case study. Given the stakes are high and the competition fierce, does one avoid taking gambles or must one do it to differentiate, and ultimately win?

I tend to believe the latter, but of course, the tipping point between moderation and foolishness can be a very gray area indeed. The beauty or ugliness is often in the eye of the beholder.

How does one find differentiation, given that the competition has to be considered equally knowledgeable? Coming into any draft, one might hope to find value in some general locations.

We often talk about balance in the context of roster composition. Here, I will discuss how I deployed a balanced strategy in terms of seeking draft-day value.

I will look into five potential value factors in the context of the 2012 NL Tout draft – players missing time, emerging youngsters, post-hype players, older players and the potential beneficiaries of a role change.

There are two primary ways players can miss time – injury and suspension.

As recently as a month ago, I had hoped to leverage the expected suspension of Ryan Braun by picking him up for $25-$30 and riding out the 50-game storm. The Hebrew Hammer’s nifty escape from penalty scuttled that plan, as he went for fair value. $39 was more than I wanted to spend on any player.

I did nab another of my scratch-and-dent sale position player targets, however.

Players coming off injuries could certainly be a source of value, as some drafters are more risk-averse than others. Ryan Howard was a targeted player for me coming into the draft. I know the Phillies’ first baseman’s Achilles injury was severe and his numbers were trending downward even prior. Still, getting his power for under $20 – if he makes it back in a timely manner – could be a difference-maker this season.

I was more than willing to take a shot at $15. After all, I spent $21 on Ike Davis last year at the same position. Despite receiving almost nothing in return from the Mets first-sacker, I still finished in second place in 2011.

Even so, I had my draft-day limits. There seemed even too much risk for me to take Howard’s compadre on the right side of the Phillies infield, Chase Utley. For the second consecutive year, the second baseman enters the season as a major unknown, but still drew a $10 winning bid. Stephen Drew at $9 was a better gamble in this same vicinity, in my estimation.

My plan coming in was to draft one injury risk position player star and one such pitcher. Had the Tout draft been three or four weeks earlier, such as when LABR drafts, I would have targeted St. Louis Cardinal Adam Wainwright, coming off Tommy John surgery. That was no longer feasible, as the right-hander’s performance this month brought his Tout price up to full value at $20.

Knowing that the shoulder problem of Wainwright’s teammate, Chris Carpenter, is nerve-related, not structural, made me consider the right-hander – if the price was right. Informal word is that the Cards are hoping for a May return, but that is far from firm. Even half a season from the aging veteran would be gravy, so I was pleased to snap up Carpenter at $6.

Not everyone admired the pick. One Tout veteran grumbled to me just after the draft, “I sure would hate it if a player like Carpenter swings the league this season.” If he really feels that way, why didn’t he bid $7? We will see if it will be to my benefit that I am apparently less risk averse than my competitor in this case.

A lower-profile player I liked in a similar situation as Wainwright, but a few months behind in his rehab, is Jorge De La Rosa. Unfortunately for me, the Colorado left-hander was snapped up late in the draft for $4 after my roster was full. I had hoped to slip De La Rosa onto my roster in the reserve rounds, but these Touts are too sharp for that.

Neither Howard nor Carpenter would cost me a Tout reserve spot as they can be moved to the unlimited-in-size Tout disabled list as soon as their MLB clubs make the official moves.

Of course, I need to find their production elsewhere in the interim. With Howard in mind, I drafted Daniel Murphy. Even when Howard returns, Murphy will have considerable value for my team because of his multi-position eligibility. I can slot the Met into five of the six infield positions.

This type of flexibility is an area not always fully valued by the Touts, in my estimation. Accruing at-bats, albeit productive ones, is crucial for logging winning totals in the offensive counting stats. Murphy can help keep that train rolling along.

Emerging players is an area that the Touts always mine very heavily. There is nothing more stimulating to a member of our industry than to be able to proclaim that “I was all over Joe Blow before anyone else heard of him.”

Of course, there is more merit than just bragging rights in owning such a youngster before he reaches the bigs. Avoiding what could be an expensive and risky FAAB bidding process later on can make it worthwhile to invest in and hold such a potential impact player until he arrives.

Touts have grown increasingly aggressive in this area, picking up these potential leverage players earlier and earlier each year. Such an example is Bryce Harper, who was auctioned off at $4. Once he is called up, the Nationals’ outfielder should provide a greater return this season, with the only downside tying up one of the four reserve roster spots in the interim.

Post-hype players can be a third area of potential value. Last year’s emerging player that did not impress becomes old news quickly. Industry folks generally don’t like these guys because they are no longer shiny and new. In fact, Touts tend to avoid them like the plague. Who wants to talk or read about taking a prior year’s bust?

I ventured into this water at the deep end of the pool when I bid $5 for Pedro Alvarez and no one offered $6. Reports from Pirates camp regarding the third baseman’s spring performance have been universally gloomy. Unlike last season, however, when the Bucs quickly lost confidence in Alvarez and shipped him back to the minors, the club made the unusual proclamation early on that Pedro had made the team. I am willing to bet $5 that Alvarez will be given enough time and that his talent will eventually emerge. If not, only a small investment would be lost.

A post-peak veteran player I had specifically targeted and acquired is Carlos Beltran ($19). With him, the concern is always health, not production. The Cardinals plan to play the former Mets star in right field most days (against right-handed pitching). That move alone should help preserve his knees.

This season, Beltran will be batting just ahead of Matt Holliday (a potential 2012 NL MVP candidate, in my opinion), Lance Berkman and David Freese. As such, the switch-hitting Beltran should see a lot of very good pitches to hit. His RBI total may be down, but runs scored should rise.

Speculation about job changes is a tried-and-true fantasy approach. In addition to not buying any closers while getting several solid set-up men in this draft, I traveled down this avenue multiple times in the middle infield last weekend.

In San Francisco, the ongoing uncertainty over Freddy Sanchez’ shoulder has opened up a job for Emmanuel Burriss. I hadn’t targeted Burriss, but I knew he is the apparent opening second baseman for the Giants and a $2 bid for cheap steals was appealing enough to take.

I also grabbed another upside infielder in Daniel Descalso. His Cardinals teammate, Tyler Greene, has better speed and range and as such, remains the favorite to open the season at second base for the Cardinals. This spring, however, Descalso has outplayed Greene, who is out of options. If the latter doesn’t perform, I could see a change being made or at least a platoon being implemented. In the latter case, the left-handed hitting Descalso would hold the advantage.

Even if not, Descalso should see considerable at-bats as St. Louis’ infield utility man and would start again at third if Freese misses time for a third consecutive season. Further, if Rafael Furcal continues to scuffle, there is a chance that Greene, a natural shortstop, could move back to his natural position at least part-time, opening second for Descalso.

In the reserve rounds, I grabbed Braves shortstop Andrelton Simmons. Though everyone assumes Tyler Pastornicky ($4) is the man, that may not be the case. As of draft day, Simmons was not out of the running for the starting job to open the season as Pastornicky has been pressing. Even if Simmons loses out initially, Pastornicky is far from a proven commodity. Consider Simmons a source of cheap potential steals, sort of like Burriss without the past failures.

Our own Lord Zola must have Allstate Insurance as he created mayhem with the draft-day catching situation. He drafted four of the best in the NL (though he has since pulled off a two-for-one deal to bring his total down to three). I dodged that scrum, having rostered John Buck early-on at a price I felt was below-value ($10) and later added Jason Castro as my second backstop.

No one can or should be too excited about drafting any Astros, a woeful team that appears to be well on the way to another 100-loss season. Castro can’t be blamed for 2011, though, as he didn’t play after blowing out his knee last spring and later having foot surgery.

Houston has moved slowly with Castro this spring, but they were comfortable enough to ship out Humberto Quintero. Only competing with Chris Snyder (coming off back surgery himself) means a good chance for starter’s at-bats from Castro with the rebuilding Astros for a mere $3 investment. Even in a strict platoon, the left-handed hitting Castro appears to hold the edge.

So, we’ve covered players missing time, emerging youngsters, post-hype players, older players and those who might benefit from role changes. While I had plans in each area coming into the NL Tout draft, I wasn’t married to any of them.

Being too strict in following whatever approach one might be considering in advance could lead to a failed draft. It is always better to be open to take bargains whenever and wherever they are presented.

Such was the case when the bidding on Mets third baseman David Wright stalled and I was the last bidder. On draft day, March 25, there was only a week of camp remaining and Wright had yet to play in even one spring game. That apparently scared off the Touts.

I hadn’t expected to draft Wright, to be honest, having him pegged as a $27-$30 player. To put it mildly, I was delighted to roster the third baseman at $22. Later that day, Wright made his spring debut and without further complications, should open the season on the active roster.

There you have it. Rather than break down my NL Tout roster position-by-position, I chose to try to provide context by explaining my varied strategies to find value during the draft.

I hope the reader can re-use some of the thoughts shared, because if not, I failed here. After all, what is more boring than to read/listen to someone else go on and on about their team?

It is all about YOU winning YOUR league. Best of luck in your drafts and in this 2012 season!

(You can see the full spreadsheets for the AL, NL and Mixed-League Tout Drafts here.)

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 14-year history. Though he is the only one to remember or care, he also finished second in each of the two subsequent seasons. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com and in-season at FOXSportsMidwest.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Last Updated on Saturday, 31 March 2012 09:52
 
What may not be in your projections PDF Print E-mail
Articles of Configuration
Written by Brian Walton   
Saturday, 24 March 2012 06:38

Projections are at the root of fantasy draft preparation. As we offer time and time again here at Mastersball, they are the biggest source of our collective pride. We take them extremely seriously.

Yet one must not be lulled into complacency by what the numbers might indicate in a pristine lab environment. One must be continually attuned to the difficult-to-quantify human factor and also take that into account in your preparation.

This point was again driven home to me recently, with Toronto outfielder Colby Rasmus as the illustration.

At Fangraphs, I read a solid analysis piece looking at Rasmus’ BABIP, xBABIP, park factor and strikeout rate. The conclusion is a recommendation to fantasy players to take a shot at Rasmus this season based on his apparent depressed value in early drafts.

While I cannot dispute the data that was presented, I remain uncomfortable.

In full disclosure, I am extremely familiar with this player’s situation from years of personal interaction with him, his father, officials from his former club, the St. Louis Cardinals, and others around the game.

What we have in the case of Rasmus, in my opinion, is an extremely talented baseball player who has struggled to deal with adversity and has yet to take responsibility for his own actions. At just 25 years of age, Rasmus still has time, but I have yet to see the positive signals I would expect.

This spring, former major league catcher Gregg Zaun, a member of the Blue Jays media partner, sportsnet.ca, made comments critical of Rasmus’ play after the outfielder had joined Toronto in trade from St. Louis last July.

Specifically, Zaun called out Rasmus for a perceived lack of hustle. It was a familiar verse to Cardinals fans, some of whom had long compared Rasmus to another ex-St. Louis disappointment from the past, J.D. Drew.

Rasmus, a player who logged one of baseball’s best OPS+ marks in 2010 at 133, batted just .173 with a .517 OPS in his 140 plate appearances after being dealt to Toronto, Worse, Rasmus did not demonstrate the edge in the field that Zaun expected to see.

As one would expect, Rasmus’ manager John Farrell came out in defense of his player. Then, upon reporting to Jays’ spring training camp in Dunedin, Fla., Rasmus addressed the media.

Rather than take the high road, Rasmus returned to familiar ground, dredging up his unpleasant experiences with the Cardinals. We are left to believe lingering concerns over shabby treatment from his former manager Tony La Russa, the St. Louis media and Cardinals fans caused Rasmus’ poor play after joining Toronto.

Rasmus’ father, a key figure in campaigning to get his son traded from St. Louis, suggests the Blue Jays were behind his son’s eagerness to talk about the past. Whether or not that is true doesn’t matter as much as it provides another data point that it is always seems to be someone else’s doing.

What seems to be most under Rasmus’ control, his play on the field, is not going well in 2012. Through Friday, his spring batting average is under the Mendoza Line at .188.

You can decide for yourself, but my conclusion is that unless Rasmus can reach the point where he can look in the mirror and take responsibility, he may be destined for continued underachievement - a career that would be most remembered for what might have been.

What a shame that would be.

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 14-year history. Though he is the only one to remember or care, he also finished second in each of the two subsequent seasons. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com and in-season at FOXSportsMidwest.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Last Updated on Sunday, 25 March 2012 07:08
 
Check Your Loyalties at the Door PDF Print E-mail
Articles of Configuration
Written by Brian Walton   
Saturday, 17 March 2012 00:00

Let’s admit it. We were all baseball fans before we played fantasy and would be even had our variation of the game never been invented. Deep-seated fandom is something that remains with us year after year and decade after decade, while by definition, re-draft fantasy rosters are transitory.

We all live in a city or area around which there is a home team. Through our daily newspaper, conversations at work and at the dinner table, we know more about the local nine than any other club. It is only natural.

Using that knowledge when drafting and trading is a fair (versus unfair) advantage – one we should deploy whenever possible.

Chances are your league-mates already know which team you follow most closely. But if your past actions have led them to believe you will show favoritism toward that club’s players in the context of your fantasy play, it is time to shake yourself up.

If you are in it to win, your goal should be to secure the very best group of players, regardless of uniform. If you are a Red Sox fan, that could mean rostering Yankees, for example. I know some who just can’t bring themselves to even consider such a thing, but in bowing to such prejudices, they are only hurting themselves.

In an auction draft, whenever I bring up players from the team I follow most closely, the St. Louis Cardinals, I look around the table as some number of my competitors react. They actually think I am always after these players. Often, I am just burning money. Unless you are at a crucial stage of the draft, let others throw out the players you want.

Then again, being predictable is not good, either. Among Touts, I have a reputation as a spread the risk style of drafter. Yet very early in the 2011 NL Tout draft, I selected Albert Pujols at $42. Not only was he from “my team,” he tied (with Hanley Ramirez) for the most expensive player taken all day.

This is a more typical scenario for me. A couple of years ago, I drafted a young pitcher, Jaime Garcia, from my favored team. After trying for weeks to move pitching for hitting in a league in which that is often very difficult, Garcia turned out to be a difference-maker in a championship season.

My prospective trade partner and I were about to call off negotiations, when out of the blue, he threw out Garcia as a deal-sweetener. He may have assumed I wasn’t going to trade a Cardinal. If so, he was wrong. I didn’t wait 30 seconds before accepting his offer just as presented and went on to win the league.

If some of your league-mates are biased and want players on their favorite team, keep that knowledge in mind, not just on draft day and at trade time. During FAAB bidding, be prepared to bid an extra couple of dollars if you anticipate coming up against a team-favored bidder on an emerging player.

This home-team advantage isn’t always. Sometimes, I actually find this familiarity to be a detriment.

Just as I know the players’ strengths, I know their weaknesses, their vulnerabilities and I find that I can over-emphasize the warts now and then. Other times, I find myself taking a local player a year ahead of his breakout, only to see another owner reap the benefit in a redraft league the next season.

All things considered, you should not hesitate to grab home-team players – when it makes sense. You should also be just as willing to deal with the less-pleasant side of trading them (or releasing them if they stumble) just as with any other player.

I know. It is easier to say than do, but your results will be better and it won’t make you any less of a fan. Honest!

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 14-year history. Though he is the only one to remember or care, he also finished second in each of the two subsequent seasons. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com and in-season at FOXSportsMidwest.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Last Updated on Sunday, 18 March 2012 10:56
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 9 of 21
720p Film izle online film izle hd film izle
sex izle,türk seks Hd Film izle Linux Vps hosting Seo Danışmanı film izle Online Film izle