Log in Register

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *

fb mb tw mb

Saturday 30th Jul 2016

Some of us – perhaps even you – have problems stepping away from a bad decision – compounding the mistake with incremental related moves.

It is a natural behavior, believing in the reasons you made your initial decision, sticking with that plan, hoping for future validation - even as the idea more quickly circles the drain.

Such is the case in a saga that began with a Fall 2013 trade I made in the Xperts Fantasy League, or XFL. As is often the case in this column, I outline my foibles in hopes that you might avoid a similar pitfall.

The XFL is a dynasty league in which we are allowed 15 keepers against a 40-man roster. One unique challenge is the requirement to declare our keepers for next season before the current World Series is done. The draft follows at the start of November.

In the process of analyzing one’s roster, the wise owner also looks at potential difficult keeper decisions his competitors may be facing.

I’ve written about the continued success that fellow Mastersball staffer Don Drooker has demonstrated in this format. One reason why is his approach in trading. Don does not send out the lazy broadcast note to the entire league offering up his borderline players, nor does he send out general communications about his needs.

Instead, he takes the time to craft specific one-on-one trade proposals, considering the position of the other owner. I don’t always trade with Don, but when we do talk, it is never a waste of time, nor does it take long to do an evaluation. I respect that.

In October 2013, Don contacted me with an offer for a player coming off a bad season that he suspected he could buy low – Cubs shortstop Starlin Castro. Making a potential trade easier for me was the fact that I had some young infielders coming up who could provide a lower-cost roster replacement.

Drooker correctly noticed that my potential keepers for 2014 lacked outfield talent and power.

In return for Castro, he offered another player with a +$3 contract (compared to the usual +$5), but with even greater questions in Angels outfielder Josh Hamilton. Despite Hamilton’s contract being higher ($23 vs. $13, as I recall), I accepted the deal.

As the 2014 season played out, Castro had a solid bounceback campaign, while Hamilton played in just 89 games while battling rib cage and shoulder ailments in what became his worst season in eight as a Major Leaguer.

Preparing for 2015, Drooker had a strong keeper in Castro, while Hamilton was clearly getting thrown back into the free agent pool.

Anyone can make a bad trade, which I did, but here is where I made matters far worse.

When Hamilton was nominated in the XFL auction last November, I made a $12 bid. I am not sure why. No one said, “$13,” so in a matter of a few seconds, the troubled Angel was back on my squad.

Instead of cutting my losses, I went against the odds and gambled that I could recoup some of my lost 2014 investment in 2015.

It was a questionable decision at best in November 2014. By early February, the downward slope increased with news that Hamilton had waited until then to have shoulder surgery, a decision that would cause him to open the regular season on the disabled list.

The icing on the cake was the late February news that Hamilton had come forward with an admission that his alcohol and substance abuse problems had returned. That put not only his 2015 season, but potentially his entire career, in jeopardy.

In most leagues, at least those with March drafts, Hamilton became a persona non grata. That was further reinforced in April when Angels owner Arte Moreno cast doubt upon whether Hamilton would ever return to his team. Now it appears the outfielder will be returning to the Rangers, but has rehab time still ahead.

I am not complaining about the timing of the November XFL draft. I love the challenge it presents. The problem is my own – the refusal to cut my losses on an obviously-flawed player left a major hole in my 2015 lineup.

So, please learn from my mistake. Leave the decisions of the past behind. Make today’s decisions based on today’s facts. Had I done that, Hamilton would be someone else’s XFL problem, not mine.


Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.


One of the realities of playing in higher-visibility leagues with industry peers is that we write about our teams and strategies. Personally, I always try to ground my writing in real-world examples.

In the case of my friends and competitors, some of them are even better writers than fantasy players, and that says a lot. In addition to enjoying their content - because they provide insight into their decisions made – I try to take advantage of the learning opportunities made available.

On one hand, no matter how good we think we are at these games, if we don't think we can gain some useful tricks from others, we will eventually fail, if for no other reason than our own arrogance.

Further, because I share leagues with many of these writers, I can gain a peek into the thought processes of my direct competitors. Consider this. In your home leagues, wouldn't it be cool if your top challengers had to submit an essay on their approach to try to beat you?

An example came up last week right here at Mastersball. While he is now a staff writer, Don Drooker has not always been "in" the industry. That does not say anything about his high level of proficiency in playing, though. As Don reminded readers in his most recent column, he has been the champion in our dynasty league, XFL or Xperts Fantasy League, four times in the last decade, including three in one recent four-year stretch – against some very tough competitors. (I am among the majority of the league still looking for a first title.)

In case you did not read Don's column, here is the link. Please check it out.

His subject was the XFL's spring supplemental draft, which follows our November auction. While Don recapped his own selections, he also considered the decisions each owner may have been faced with when his turn came up in the first couple of rounds.

That is when an old scab of mine was picked. It was nothing Don said specifically, but a rules change that is causing me pain. More on that in a moment after I set the stage.

Having blown up my team last year to re-invest for the future, I finished dead last in 2014 – a first in my decade in the league. As I have written before, I waited a year too long to step up and do it. As a result, despite a number of re-stocking trades made, the league's stats provider has my current roster in 15th place in its projected 2015 standings, as well.

Here's what got me going again now. As Don recapped the first-round selections in our supplemental draft, I re-lived exactly what I knew would happen coming in – the best investments for the future were long gone by the time my initial pick came up, 14th overall.

Any player who qualifies as a rookie when selected in this auxiliary draft will (until eventually dropped) enjoys a $3 salary increase each season instead of the usual $5 on top of a $1 base. That difference can add multiple years of control to a young player's roster runway.

Even though the household names on Baseball America's top 100 prospect list have been owned for years in this 40-man roster league, the recent influx of Cuban talent has increased the value of these initial picks in the supplemental draft.

To that end, in 2015, three of the first five players off the board were Yoan Moncada, Hector Olivera and Yasmany Tomas. Looking back to last spring, as you might expect, Jose Abreu was that number one selection. This time around, by pick 14, the best option remaining was Minnesota designated hitter Kennys Vargas – not a bad player, but not a rookie and hardly a future franchise cornerstone.

You might be wondering why if I finished in last place last season was I picking 14th of 15 teams this year.

The simple answer is that to address one problem, the league's pendulum was swung hard – perhaps too hard - in the other direction.

Traditionally, the XFL was like many leagues, including yours perhaps, in that the lower-finishing teams were given earlier draft spots the following season. This was considered a way to assist those clubs in the rebuilding process and level out league competition over time.

However, the XFL's initial approach was in fact a hybrid, in which the top five teams in the standings were moved to the end of the line the next year with prior season finishers six through 15 picking first.

This oddity was defended by some, who insisted there was viable bragging value in finishing second, third, fourth or fifth, which I never understood. Either you win or you don't, in my opinion.

That is not what led to a rules change, though. One of the teams that looked to be set to finish in fifth place one season understood the huge benefit that would be realized if he could end up in sixth place instead of fifth. It would be the difference between having the first pick the next spring versus the 11th pick.

To try to help make that happen artificially, the owner fielded a late-season lineup consisting of as many reserves and injured players as he could activate.

While this was not explicitly prohibited by the league rules, it surely was not in bounds in the field of fair play.

As a result of that gaming, I was among the league majority who voted in favor of a rules change.

For the last few years, only the league's winner from the prior year is placed at the end of the draft queue. As an incentive to the other owners to finish as strongly as possible, the second-place through 15th-place teams are awarded the first through 14th spots in the next season's supplemental draft.

While the incentive to take a dive was eliminated by this change, it also meant the rich get even richer while the steepness of the challenge for rebuilding teams was increased since those clubs pick even later in the auxiliary draft than before.

I admit that when I voted in favor of the change, I did not seriously consider this impact on the cellar-dwellers. I was not one then and did not expect to be one later. The real world is far crueler, however.

The aforementioned Drooker, coming off three wins in the prior four years, came in second in 2013. His reward was the right to select Abreu as the number one pick in the 2014 auxiliary draft, gaining years of the Cuban's services at a bargain rate.

Another second-place finish followed for him in 2014, so Don had his pick of this spring's litter, too, claiming Moncada. The rules helped him to reload on the fly with premium, low-cost keeper talent, while I am destined to try to rebuild my leaky roster with scrap lumber.

I honestly do not yet have "the" answer to this dilemma. Those who play consistently well should benefit. Those who cannot compete should not complain – but that does not mean all rule changes necessarily work as hoped, either.

I bring up this example here both for therapeutic purposes and to remind you to evaluate the collateral damage that rule change proposals might cause before you execute them. Consider the reality that you will have to live with both the good and bad and it just may be you in the dunking tank next time.

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

If you are like me, you are much closer to the conclusion of your spring draft season than the start. In fact, in my case, my first draft was way back in early November, and for that league, the XFL, or Xperts Fantasy League, we have already held our second, auxiliary draft. I am down to just one local league draft remaining.

At this point, it is natural to be focused on your remaining drafts, or if they are complete, to enjoy the pleasant distractions that the early spring weather is offering in many parts of the country - but please, do not lose focus now.

You spent days and weeks readying for your drafts. You have your teams – and are likely pleased with them. Well, you shouldn’t be.

Now is not the time to sit back. Instead, take the initiative to sit down and carefully and objectively analyze the roster you assembled on draft day. Do it – right now!

OK, where are its strengths and weaknesses? What positions do you need to address? Be honest, please!

Do not only consider the obvious needs – starters who are opening the season on the disabled list. Also evaluate your reserves. Do you have someone to slot into the infield in the case of an injury, for example?

Keep an eye on the timing of announcements by MLB clubs of players actually being placed on the disabled list. The moves can be made at any time, even retroactively, but not all teams act at the same time. Some may wait until their own opening day. And of course, your stats provider cannot and will not reflect such a move until it is actually made.

Most leagues have some kind of disabled list. Maybe yours has only a spot or two or perhaps your leagues are like Tout Wars, with an unlimited DL. Either way, you should establish a plan to backfill those spots immediately.

For example, take my National League Tout roster. I bought into the Jaime Garcia optimism for $4 and also took Homer Bailey for $12, knowing full well I would not get an opening day start from the latter.

The Cardinals placed Garcia on the DL this past week, while the Reds are still waiting to officially make the moves they have already announced, including Bailey. So, Garcia can also move to the Tout DL and a replacement can be added but Bailey may take up a roster spot for another week.

Why this is important is the real reason I am writing this story. You should already know when your league’s first waiver period begins, but if you don’t, stop reading this right now, go and find out. I will still be here. I promise.

No matter when your draft was held, MLB teams have since made changes that either impact your fantasy roster directly or created opportunity for you to secure additional upside players for your squad.

Now is the time to strike to fill those roster gaps you have identified, because if you don’t, someone else in your league surely will.

Perhaps you are short of speed. Likely when you drafted, no one in your league had even heard of Odubel Herrera. Now the rookie has become the starting centerfielder in Philadelphia with a chance for 20+ steals.

Players undrafted in many leagues are receiving the opportunity to join major league rotations, too. Take St. Louis, where there had been a spirited three-way battle for one rotation spot as recently as a week ago. Garcia’s injury and the decision to send impressive prospect Marco Gonzales to Triple-A has since completely cleared the way for Carlos Martinez’ starting berth.

Or take Arizona, where veteran Trevor Cahill was dealt away to Atlanta to create a rotation spot for top prospect Archie Bradley.

These are just a few examples that quickly come to mind from literally dozens of late-breaking situations that have come to pass across MLB in the last few days.

Yet, I understand that not everyone has the time to keep up on all these moves. Here is a tip on how to check quickly for up-to-date information on who has jobs and who doesn’t.

The folks at rosterresource.com, formerly MLB Depth Charts, maintain a handy grid of starters, bench players, rotations and relief corps for all 30 teams, as well as which players appear to be DL-bound.

A quick scan of that grid can help you quickly identify new names, who should become possible acquisition targets.

Remember, now is the time to act. Maintain that momentum from your draft. Be aggressive. Make the moves to try to close your gaps in your very first transaction period and good luck this season!

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.


How many times have we read or listened to people offer aggressive advice, not knowing if they would really take the necessary steps themselves?

I have. And this week, I can report that I have sampled the taste of my own medicine – gambling an entire season’s worth of free agent allocation budget (FAAB) money – and still missing out due to flawed execution.

Last week in this space, I encouraged fantasy owners - as strongly as I could in print – to make a post-draft evaluation of your rosters, analyzing weaknesses and taking corrective action at the first opportunity.

I explained that in many leagues, that window is widest during your first league transaction period. At that time, MLB roster and role decisions made in the final hours of spring training camps lead to fresh plums that were unpicked on draft day.

That story could be written convincingly since I was writing about my own blueprint for National League Tout Wars.

Part I. The Problem

Coming out of that draft, I had a strong offense, with starters at every position. However, my pitching took a hit, with four solid mid-tier starters, a good closer and four $1-type roster fillers.

Worse, in the reserve rounds, I gambled on a pair of competitors for a starting job in Arizona who both failed. Despite Trevor Cahill being traded away, my bets on Randall Delgado (bullpen) and Allen Webster (minors) did not come through.

That same transaction opened a rotation berth for top prospect Archie Bradley, who is one of the few non-Colorado NL starting options who were not claimed on Tout’s draft day. The 22-year-old has been a top-25 prospect in MLB for the last four years running, according to Baseball America.

While I would like Bradley in my lineup, I know other NL Tout warriors would, too. The fact that Cincinnati lefty Tony Cingrani fetched a winning bid of $52 early in the season two years ago - and went on to perform well - sticks in my mind as a potential benchmark.

To be honest, though, I am not sure if an unproven Bradley would be worth half a season’s FAAB - or more. He clearly has the longest runway of the NL starting options available, but Tout is a redraft league. The need is to produce now, as even reserve roster spots are precious.

After all, Bradley is far from a slam dunk. While his minor league career strikeout rate of 9.5 per nine innings is tantalizing, my excitement is diminished by his comparable walk rate of 4.5. On the latter number, the trend is heading in the wrong direction, as Bradley issued 5.1 free passes per nine last season. Add a so-so at best Diamondbacks defense behind him and a park that seems to give up a lot of runs and you can perhaps understand my trepidation.

Yet, all things considered, I saw Bradley as the pick of this NL starting pitcher litter:

  1. Archie Bradley

Trevor Cahill – Traded with $6.5 million pinned to his shirt and $5.5 million more coming from his new club, looking for a fresh start with the rebuilding Braves.

  1. David Buchanan – A very impressive spring for the (gulp) Philadelphia Phillies while coming off a nice 2014 MLB debut.
  2. Jordan Lyles – Despite 10 walks in 22 1/3 spring innings, a WHIP under 1.00. There is that little Colorado thing to worry about, however.
  3. Eric Stults – After eight years in the league, what Atlanta’s fifth starter can offer is known. Yawn.
  4. Eddie Butler – In addition to pitching for the Rockies, the rookie has had shoulder trouble this spring. Do I really need another Jaime Garcia? Pass.

Part II. The Plan

With as many as three roster openings, and given I felt the top three pitchers stood above the other three listed above, I decided to bid as aggressively as possible.

Due to a below-par finish last season, I began 2014 with $93 of FAAB. Unable to make primary bids in a greater amount than my total, here is where I landed:

  1. Bradley $41
  2. Cahill $26
  3. Buchanan $26

Contingencies were included with the above to ensure I was not shut out if I was outbid for any of the three. In reality, I expected to lose out on Bradley, but at least force his new owner to pay handsomely, and win Cahill, Buchanan and Lyles or possibly Stults. The latter two were given $11 contingent bids.

While the three primary bid amounts may seem random, they are not. Totaling them, you can see that I had put my entire season’s FAAB budget on the line this first week. However, the Vickrey bidding process deployed in Tout provided some potential protection from myself. In that system, the winning amount paid for a player is reduced to $1 more than the second-highest offer.

So, in my dream world, I would secure all three starters and have $10 or $20 bucks remaining to stretch over the remainder of the season. More realistically, I would get my #2, #3 and #4 choices and still have at least $30 left in the bank.

Knowing any three pitchers will probably all not work out, at least I would have plenty of time to evaluate their respective performances before having to develop a far more modest in scope Plan B.

Part III. The Execution

As I am responsible to recap the weekly NL Tout bidding for Mastersball, I like to write my section as soon as the results are posted at midnight Eastern Time Sunday night/Monday morning.

Given the size of my bets, I admit that I approached this deadline with greater trepidation than usual, however.

As it turned out, by 12:01 a.m. ET on Monday, I was crushed by my greediness, not getting any of my three top choices. Making the failure even more painful is the fact that I came in second in the bidding on all three, missing out on Bradley by just $4.

I say “greediness” because I had originally decided to focus on Bradley and Cahill only. However, when reviewing free agents, Buchanan’s stealthy success interested me, too. By trying to spread my $93 across three pitchers instead of two, I fell short on all three.

Ending up with Lyles and Stults at the minimum $1 each actually smelled ok – for one day at least. The Rockies opened at Milwaukee, where Lyles threw six innings of two-run ball.

To see the bidding results for all Tout Wars leagues in detail as well as for the LABR leagues, remember to check out Mastersball.com each Monday morning all season long.

Part IV. In Closing

What can you learn from this?

Well, first of all, I don’t just pontificate here. I definitely taste my own medicine, even when bitter. We’ll have to see over the upcoming weeks and months if I can devise a Plan B that shores up my staff after this failed initial attempt.

Second, and far more importantly, there is still time for all of us. Even if you did not chase free agents aggressively in week one, get after it in week two. The Cingrani example mentioned above actually occurred in the second week in 2013.

Even if you do not have a Vickrey bidding buffer, take some risk and do not fall just short in your bidding as I did in this example. Hoarding FAAB while waiting for potential mid-season trades in “only”-leagues is just not worth it.

Whatever you do, take action early to improve your fantasy roster!

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Along with my Mastersball colleagues Lawr Michaels, Todd Zola, Rob Leibowitz and Zach Steinhorn, I participated in the Tout Wars industry league drafts this past weekend in New York City.

The annual events, with four drafts spread over a two-day weekend, include American and National League-only drafts, a mixed league auction and a new format based on the monthly games introduced by ShandlerPark.com last summer.

My enjoyment of the evening festivities in the Big Apple, catching up with long-time competitors and friends, are self-truncated due to the reality that the National League draft, of which I am a part, occurs last, on Sunday morning.

That offers a second challenge for me, which is being patient. Waiting until the final day, after the other three drafts are on the books, is tough.

As it turned out, being patient was a requirement for me once the draft finally began as well. My general approach is to spread the wealth, in which I keep spending on any individual player below $30 and often cases $25, in order to acquire a more balanced team and hopefully, one that is more injury resistant.

I had established a budget by position for planning purposes, with a hitting-pitching mix of $182/$78. While I was not a slave to these values, I managed the two allocations separately until late in the draft. Prior to the draft, I had looked at a variety of combinations of about six different players at each of the 23 roster spots.

Given my self-imposed pricing limitations, I had expected to remain on the sidelines during the first five or six rounds of nominations. That almost was not the case as I wanted to test the market on young players with a throw of Brewers shortstop Jean Segura. I went to $19, but unsure how much farther the bidding might go, I stopped there, and Segura went for $20.

I did pick up some cheap speed early when a competitor nominated new Braves leadoff man Eric Young, Jr. Paying $8 was a fair price for his expected 25-30 bags. That also kept me from the appearance of having done nothing in the draft, though the external chatter, if there was any, did not bother me one way or the other.

My second acquisition was a player I had not specifically targeted, Pirates outfielder Gregory Polanco. When the bidding slowed in the teens for a player I feel has a mid-20’s value, I got in. Polanco was mine for $19.

As the first break approached, the SiriusXM broadcasters singled me out from among the 12 NL Touts to come on the air to review the draft to that point. Perhaps my acquisition of players, which likely appeared slow to some, drew the attention.

As it turned out, I dulled many of those questions by spending over $80 in the last moments before the intermission, first gobbling up Marlins closer Steve Cishek for $16. With an improving Miami team, I think Cishek could approach the top tier of NL closers in value at a mid-tier closer price.

I also struck in the corner infield and outfield with a batch of low-20s players in Brandon Belt and Mark Trumbo ($23) along with Matt Holliday at $22. During the on-air interview, Rotowire’s Chris Liss questioned the Trumbo acquisition due to a low on-base mark. (Tout is an OBP format.)

I agreed that Trumbo is a drag in that category, but I also consider his 30 home run/100 RBI potential to be very real. About how many other NL players could we have that aggressive of a forecast? With a consistent .370-.380 OBP player in Holliday also safely on my roster, I felt I hadn’t sacrificed OBP terribly with Trumbo. I did avoid the Pedro Alvarezes the rest of the way, but accomplished one objective for this draft – which was to not get caught short on power – one of the league’s most precious commodities.

In 2014, I ended up with too much speed as my past concerns over the general inability to trade steals (and stolen bases) during the season were confirmed. Everyone seems to want to add power and strikeouts along the way, offering up speed and closers in trade. As a result, my lower-tier team finished with roughly two dozen more steals than the second-place team, a stat that I am not proud of.

In the middle of the draft, I dropped down into the teens for my acquisitions of the middle of the Dodgers’ infield in Howie Kendrick and Jimmy Rollins for $19 each. Snagging Adam Lind, who in my view is like a Holliday-lite, for $17 completed my core offensive group.

I went cheap at third base with a $6 Jake Lamb, who looks to be the starter to open the season for Arizona, and backed him up with another third baseman also in a good position to earn a job in San Diego’s Will Middlebrooks at $5.

Behind the plate, I joined my $11 Daniel Norris with Welington Castillo at $2. In hindsight, perhaps I should have gotten Arizona starter Tuffy Gosewisch for the same price or went a couple of bucks more for another starter in Francisco Cervelli of the Pirates. My hope is that the Cubs will trade Castillo into a starting role elsewhere.

With the exception of the aforementioned Polanco, I had considered every one of my 14 hitters in pre-draft scenario planning.

The teens is where I wanted to be in pitching, as well. My focus was to acquire four upper middle tier pitchers with good strikeout totals to match up with closer Cishek. That was accomplished with Gio Gonzalez and Julio Teheran ($16), Francisco Liriano ($13) and Homer Bailey ($12) joining my roster.

As my fellow drafter Mike Gianella from Baseball Prospectus noted afterward, the average NL Tout owner spent $6.25 more on pitching above the NL LABR average. Of course, that was reflected in individual player prices, as well.

As the draft neared its close, I still had three pitching spots and two offensive slots to fill, but also had enough money to go $3 or $4 on several players. A wise strategy would have been to add the extra dollar hammer on a few promising starters, as my offense was already pretty well lined up.

Especially with Bailey starting 2015 on the disabled list, getting some additional pitching would have been smart. Instead, I filled my middle infield position with Brandon Crawford at $5. While that is a good pick in a vacuum, it left me with $1 selections the rest of the way.

More than any selection in my draft, that seemingly innocuous $5 spent on Crawford hurt, as it took away my bidding hammer. As I watched a series of desired hurlers go for a dollar more than I could spend, my agony was increased when I was able to snare a decent middle infield alternative, Dan Uggla, in the second reserve round. By then, the Crawford buy was already ancient history, but I was still feeling its impact.

Other than take a boatload of bad starting pitchers, after getting Jaime Garcia for $4 (I think he will be starting somewhere) and Jeremy Hellickson for $1, I had added setup men Pedro Strop and Jordan Walden to complete my nine arms.

My advice to you is this. Make sure you allocate some time to think about the end game, and specifically, your strategy in it. You cannot really prepare for this in advance, which makes it more challenging, other than perhaps to have a group of preferred $2-$3 pitchers and hitters identified. During your draft, there may not be time for a break at the right moment and with players being taken faster and faster in the latter phase of an auction, think time between picks is shortened.

Still, it behooves you to find a way to do take a brief step back. In this example, I should have realized my roster’s strengths and weaknesses and placed my end-game focus on pitching instead of beefing up an already solid group of hitters.

All in all, I believe I have a competitive offense and a very good pitching base. I ended up spending $180/$80 on hitting and pitching, but the overall higher pitching prices probably meant less average value for that $80. Looking ahead, I will put more emphasis in finding the 2015 version of a Jose Fernandez or two and whoever they turn out to be, to get them on my roster.

Now, the fun begins!

P.S. My team follows, with the link to all the Tout Wars rosters and winning bids. Good luck in your drafts and I hope you can glean some value from ours.


Derek Norris C $11
Gio Gonzalez P $16
Welington Castillo C $2
Julio Teheran P $16
Brandon Belt 1B $23
Francisco Liriano P $13
Jake Lamb 3B $6
Homer Bailey P $12
Adam Lind CI $17
Jaime Garcia P $4
Howie Kendrick 2B $19
Jeremy Hellickson P $1
Jimmy Rollins SS $19
Pedro Strop P $1
Brandon Crawford MI $5
Jordan Walden P $1
Mark Trumbo OF $23
Steve Cishek P $16
Matt Holliday OF $22

Gregory Polanco OF $19

Eric Young, Jr. OF $8

Will Middlebrooks DH $5

Jonny Gomes SW $1


Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Latest Tweets

We are featured as always!

fbg2016 cover 210 160w


LABR Fantasy League

Our Authors